An AI Agent Needs a Defined Job and Defined Authority
Updated: Oct 30

An assistant that drafts a recommendation and an agent that changes business records carry different responsibilities. Before connecting an agent to operational systems, leadership needs to define the job it is being trusted to perform.
Consider an agent supporting supplier onboarding. It might collect documents, identify missing fields, and prepare a record for review. The authority to change bank details or approve a supplier introduces a different level of consequence. Those boundaries should be explicit before implementation begins.
Describe the permitted actions, information sources, financial limits, and exceptions. Specify when the agent must stop, what it should tell a person, and who is responsible for resolving the issue. A broad instruction to be helpful is not a substitute for these decisions.
Give the agent only the access needed for its job. Keep a record of material actions and the approvals that allowed them. Test incomplete information, conflicting requests, unexpected input, and unavailable systems, as well as the easy cases.
Every deployed agent needs a business owner, a technical owner, and a practical way to suspend its actions. When its purpose changes, review its authority again. Access suitable for a narrow pilot may be inappropriate for a wider rollout.
360Views can design the agent’s operating model, Microsoft integrations, permissions, and evaluation process. Useful automation begins with a clear answer to a leadership question: what are we authorizing this system to do on our behalf?




Comments